How did our working language become so lazy?

Much has been spoken and written about the new language (driven by social media interaction on Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp etc.) being introduced into our lexicon by millennials or Gen-Y and their ability to integrate and influence the current working culture by using it. Personally I think they’ll find that it’s not much different to that which they already use, in fact I think they’ll find that their ‘elders’ shorten words and phrases much more than they do. Just because we use it in a business context rather than personal doesn’t make it any more or less acceptable.

It wasn’t always that way.

Initialism

Liverpool (UK) people – and I’m one – are renowned for shortening words and names. James was Jimmy; off licence (liquor store) was the ‘offy’; the Cavern was the ‘Cav’; and Christmas was ‘Chrimbo’. This is seen as an endearing feature of our regional dialect and in some ways is expected of scousers wherever we go. The closest I got to an initialism when I was younger was my ‘EFC are Magic’ badge, but that’s only because it was hard to fit Everton Football Club on something that was 5cm in diameter.

However, I’m not sure I was prepared for a whole different language once I started work. Obviously there were words and phrases that I was unfamiliar with, but I quickly got to grips with these as I spent the first 2 or 3 weeks learning my trade.  Even in those early days of work, I don’t remember too many collections of words or phrases being shortened. The manager was still the manager, dockets were still dockets, close of play was ‘by the end of the day’ and it was all very easy to understand. And then around in late 80s the CD arrived, them some eejit changed personnel to HR, IBM became massive and the working language changed forever (RIP) as we sought to give mundane tasks, projects and job titles ‘flashy’ initialisms or acronyms.

Before I continue, here are a couple of definitions in order to avoid any confusion:

Acronym – an abbreviation formed from the initial letters of other words and pronounced as a word

Initialism – an abbreviation consisting of initial letters pronounced separately

For some reason I don’t have too many issues with acronyms as they don’t feel lazy. NATO, NASA, SIM, SARS and er, ABBA are just some examples. Even though they’re abbreviations, they have the good sense to form themselves into words so as to still sound normal and to make my life easier. Also, I generally know what they mean as it makes sense to pronounce them as a word, especially ABBA.

Initialisms on the other hand tend to confuse me (other than S.O.S) and millions of others worldwide and yet we’re doing sweet FA to banish them from our working culture. They’re growing like weeds in camel dung. Even worse, most organisations now have an acronym dictionary (despite most of them not being acronyms) as part of their induction!

THEM: “Welcome to the company Colin, we’re specifically set up to alienate new starters by using a language akin to Klingon, but worse because this is real, whilst Klingon isn’t*. If you last more than 5 years you’ll have a fighting chance of finally understanding what we’re talking about, although we’ll have introduced some more whilst you’re learning these, so it’s unlikely. No matter, go ahead and read this 4 page PDF acronym dictionary or AD as we like to call it.”

ME: “Right, thanks. Do you have a similar document that articulates your vision and describes in detail the behaviours you expect from me in order that we can share in the organisation’s success?'”

THEM: “No.”

ME: “OMG”

Initialisms are never more rife than within projects. How many of you have a project in your organisation whose name has been shortened to its initials e.g. the BFG project? I rest my case. The bigger projects will be sponsored by the COO with QA from the CFO and CIO, but will ultimately be managed by a strong PM (whose delivery instincts are part of their DNA) with support from the PMO and oversight from HR. There’ll be a PID (with an FAQ section) on the back of a BC and If the project requires any kind of procurement activity, expect an RFI or RFQ, followed by an RFP which will need to be QA’d by those people on the panel. If it’s an IT project there’ll be a weekly PSR and then testing – SIT, BIT and UAT before we decide that all is well and we implement it by writing an EPR to put it into BAU (but only once the PSC has approved it).

There isn’t a day that goes by where we’re not FYI’d, CC’d or BCC’d on an email delivered in HTML format. Oh and BTW, sometimes they require our response ASAP or at the latest by COP today. If you’re a CEO (who likely paid COD for their BMW) you can just get your EA or PA to do it, or else just ask a GM.

No doubt someone way more qualified in English than I am (I got a B pass in my ‘O’ Level) would point out that this is just the modernisation of our language; the countless voice box hours saved by not pronouncing words in full; as well as the flaws in my historical recollections of initialism, but personally I miss those days when we had the time to use words as they were intended rather than look to short cut our conversations.

*No doubt there is a Klingon language and someone has probably put together a dictionary, I just didn’t want to Google it and have my wife discover it in my internet history.

That’s not motivation, it’s bullying

bully1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I worked with someone a few years back who thought that as a leader they were someone to be held up as an example.  You know the type, always looking to make a point in perceived ‘important’ meetings by denigrating others; talking about how we could increase business value whilst pursuing personal goals; preaching the need for consistency and yet looking to short cut everything the organisation did; and talking up the team and how motivated they all were, whilst having the highest attrition rate of any area in the business. Self awareness was not a skill.

The behaviours were of particular concern to us as a management group and yet when we raised them as such, we were told that we didn’t understand the motivation skills and we need only look at the performance of the team to see how it was paying off. Our Director did not want to deal with the issues either as he felt that eventually the person would leave and yet, things got progressively worse as we lost key staff.

Behaviours we observed including the following (with the ‘reasons’ they gave provided in brackets):

  • Micro management (close coaching in order to lift capability)
  • Embarrassing staff members in meetings (immediate honesty is important in order to rectify their approach)
  • Over working staff (it’s their job, they need to learn to cope better)
  • Overuse of ‘formal’ emails (it’s important that people understand my stance clearly)
  • Denying team members opportunities to advance in other business areas (if it’s not right for me, it’s not right for the team)
  • Aggression (I’m a passionate person, it’s hard to keep it in check when it’s for the good of the organisation)
  • Exclusion or isolation of others (I’ll bring them into the fold when the time is right)

As a management team we sought to address the issues through honesty and yet when I think back now, not one of us used the ‘B’ word.  Would it have made any difference if we had?  I’m not sure, although I’m sure we’d have possibly sowed a seed of doubt. We discussed the issues with HR, who immediately put them back on our Director to deal with. We raised the issues in our weekly one to one meetings in the hope that they would be addressed, but they weren’t.

In the end the person relocated to another part of the country and decided to resign.

As a leadership team we sought to learn the lessons by publicly reiterating the behaviours that were expected of the team (and what they could expect of us as leaders), we also listed those that weren’t acceptable. We set up an email inbox for staff to report inappropriate behaviours (witnessed or received) and gave our HR representative responsibility for working with managers to deal with any issues quickly.

According to experts Einarsen and Zapf there are five main types of bullying and these should never be seen in the workplace or any place for that matter:

  1. Work related
  2. Personal attacks
  3. Social isolation
  4. Verbal threats
  5. Spreading rumours

In a Duncan and Riley study published a few years back, they stated that more than one in five people are bullied at work; in some industries, such as health, welfare, education, government and semi–government services, the figure is far higher, ranging from 25%, 50% to 97%. This is simply not good enough. Every organisation has to take a good look at itself and its culture and ensure that it promotes the good whilst dealing with the bad. And as leaders we have a responsibility to stand up to bullying and ensure we do all we can to eradicate it from our workplace, for ever.

 

Connect with me on LinkedIn at au.linkedin.com/in/1969colin

Your problem is you

I’m sick of the moaning, seriously I am.  ‘Why can’t I have more money?’ ‘Why is this process so hard?’ ‘Why doesn’t the organisation do it this way?’ ‘Why does he/she behave that way?’ ‘I’ve been here a thousand years, why haven’t I been promoted?’. Why, why, why?

I’ll tell you why, it’s because of the following:

1. You lack self-awareness and want others to change instead

2. You lack the ability to grab accountability and make a difference

3. You want everything on a plate without doing any more to earn it

If you wake up every morning (you should celebrate that, by the way) asking yourself ‘why?’, the first question you should be asking yourself, is ‘what can I do to change this situation?’ and guess what, you can always do something because there isn’t a single person in the world who is the model employee and knows everything. So what can you do to change it?

  • Can you do that thing that is frustrating you in a different way?
  • Can you talk to someone in a different way?
  • Can you escalate your problem or ask someone (internal or external) for guidance?
  • Is there anything you can do to understand the situation/problem better?
  • Are you just reacting badly to a necessary change?
  • Do you understand what your priorities are?
  • Do you have any kind of plan – that you’re following – to get to the end of what you’re doing?
  • Can you just stop thinking about someone else and get on with doing your job to the best of your ability?
  • Should you just leave and get another job?

If you want the bigger, better job with more money and responsibility then chances are you’ll have to change.  Any kinds of increase (financial or status) will depend on your ability to lead, learn, inspire, encourage, fail, succeed and pass the credit back to the team; oh and to stop whining like a child being forced to eat liver (look, I just hated the texture of it, ok?).

This is how you get noticed. This is how you demonstrate your worth, gain respect and this is the way to contentment in your working life.

If you don’t want that contentment, then pack it in with the moaning during working hours and stop bringing everyone else down because you think the world owes you something. Show up at 9, sit in your corner, do your best, then leave at 5. If you have to moan about it, save it for your partner or pet because your problem isn’t your job, your problem is you.

FerrisBueller_141Pyxurz